Welcome to my blog - please tell me what YOU think about some of the things I post. I enjoy your comments.
Remember,many of the links to other articles in these posts have a finite existence: there is no way to tell how long they will be in place before being moved or removed!
This Month
| March 2004 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
March 31, 2004

Protecting agaianst Identity Theft
by
vtmnldy
on Wed 31 Mar 2004 12:14 PM CST
I received an e-mail from one of our customers this week with some suggestions for guarding against identity theft which I felt I simply had to pass on.
They were kind enough to give their permission to share these suggestions from an obviously very canny (and unusually generous) lawyer!
ATTORNEY'S ADVICE Read this and make a copy for your files in case you need to refer to it some day. Maybe we should all take some of his advice!
A corporate attorney sent the following out to the employees in his company.
1. The next time you order checks have only your initials (instead of first name) and last name put on them. If someone takes your checkbook they will not know if you sign your checks with just your initials or your first name but your bank will know how you sign your checks. 2. When you are writing checks to pay on your credit card accounts, DO NOT put the complete account number on the "For" line. Instead, just put the last four numbers. The credit card company knows the rest of the number and anyone who might be handling your check as it passes through all the check processing channels won't have access to it.
3. Put your work phone # on your checks instead of your home phone. If you have a PO Box use that instead of your home address. If you do not have a PO Box, use your work address. Never have your SS# printed on your checks. (DUH!) You can add it if it is necessary. But if you have it printed, anyone < can get it.
4. Place the contents of your wallet on a photocopy machine, do both sides of each license, credit card, etc. You will know what you had in your wallet and all of the account numbers and phone numbers to call and cancel. Keep the photocopy in a safe place. I also carry a photocopy of my passport when I travel either here or abroad. We've all heard horror stories about fraud that's committed on us in stealing a name, address, Social Security number, credit cards, etc. Unfortunately I, an attorney, have firsthand knowledge because my wallet was stolen last month. Within a week, the thieve(s) ordered an expensive monthly cell phone package, applied for a VISA credit card, had a credit line approved to buy a Gateway computer, received a PIN number from DMV to change my driving record information on-line, and more.
But here's some critical information to limit the damage in case this happens to you or someone you know:
1. We have been told we should cancel our credit cards immediately. But the key is having the toll free numbers and your card numbers handy so you know whom to call. Keep those where you can find them
2. File a police report immediately in the jurisdiction where it was stolen, this proves to credit providers you were diligent, and is a first step toward an investigation (if there ever is one). Highly recommended and it pays off!
But here's what is perhaps most important: (I never even thought to do this).
3. Call the three national credit reporting organizations immediately to place a fraud alert on your name and Social Security number. I had never heard of doing that until advised by a bank that called to tell me an application for credit was made over the Internet in my name. The alert means any company that checks your credit knows your information was stolen and they have to contact you by phone to authorize new credit.
By the time I was advised to do this, almost two weeks after the theft, all the damage had been done. There are records of all the credit checks initiated by the thieves' purchases, none of which I knew about before placing the alert. Since then, no additional damage has been done, and the thieves threw my wallet away this weekend (someone turned it in). It seems to have stopped them in their tracks.
The numbers are: Equifax: 1-800-525-6285 Experian (formerly TRW): 1-888-397-3742 Trans Union: 1-800-680-7289
Social Security Administration (fraud line): 1-800-269-0271
We pass along jokes on the internet; we pass along just about everything. Pass this information along. It could really help someone you care about.

|
March 28, 2004

Supplements threatened - take action!
by
vtmnldy
on Sun 28 Mar 2004 12:15 PM CST
A matter that needs your urgent attention immediately is a bill before congress that threatens our legal right to use nutritional supplements.
The "Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2003" or Senate Bill 722 was written to amend the "Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994" or DSHEA. If passed into law, SB 722 will restrict your freedom to use nutritional supplements, potentially cripple the nutritional supplement industry, and endanger your health.
The bill was created in a reaction to fears about ephedra and was brought forth by Richard Durbin (D-Il) and co-sponsored by Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Charles Schumer (D-NY). A companion version is in the House of Representatives, titled the "Dietary Supplement Access and Awareness Act" (H.R. 3377). The intent of H.R. 3377 is to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to dietary supplements and is sponsored by Susan A. Davis (CA-53).
Dr. Julian Whitaker writes on his website, "Some of you might remember the pre-DSHEA days when the FDA was completely out of control. They raided the offices of nutritional physicians like Jonathan Wright, MD, of Kent, Washington. They barged into manufacturing facilities and seized natural substances such as stevia and GLA. They authorized the removal of coenzyme Q-10 and other supplements from health food stores, claiming they were illegal. They refused to allow any information on nutritional supplement labels that would help consumers make informed choices. They mandated that many supplements now sold over the counter require a prescription, making them more expensive and less accessible. This is the kind of tyranny we experienced then and if you think this kind of stuff couldn't happen again, you're wrong."
Please take just a few moments to block SB 722. Go to www.citizens.org click on TAKE ACTION on the main page. Type in your name, address and zipcode and a letter will be sent to your representatives. It takes 30 seconds. If you have a few more minutes write a personal letter. And if you live in California, New York, or Illinois contact the sponsors of this bill and educate them about the safety of supplements and how you and/or your clients (if you're a practitioner/fitness trainer) rely on them to be well. The Senate switchboard number is 202-224-3121 or go to www.senate.gov to contact Richard Durbin (D-Il) Hillary Clinton (D-NY) Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Charles Schumer (D-NY).
Back in 1994 over two million people wrote letters in support of DSHEA and that same type of response is needed now to protect it. We can easily top that number with increased access to the internet when sending a clear message to congress. Forward this email to your friends and family who use complementary and alternative medicine, and together we can stop this bill. |
March 20, 2004

A possible cause of Alzheimer's
by
vtmnldy
on Sat 20 Mar 2004 12:16 PM CST
| Would the threat of Alzheimer's become less frightening if a cause were found? And a treatable one at that? I think so! This new and fascinating study finds a connection between a bacterium called Chlamydia pneumoniae, consequent inflammation, and the dreaded brain plaque.
Read the report here |
March 16, 2004

Corporate thirst
by
vtmnldy
on Tue 16 Mar 2004 12:17 PM CST
The view from the Thames.
And on the organic front - a study in Wales has found that milk from organic cows has 64% more of the essential Omega 3 fatty acids than conventional milk, as well as higher levels of CLA. more »
March 12, 2004

A statinment of facts
by
vtmnldy
on Fri 12 Mar 2004 12:19 PM CST
| I was reading a commentary on the triumphant and much-trumpeted study purporting to show that Statins reduce mortality from Coronary Heart Disease by lowering LDL - if ever there was a pattern-book case of proving the need for skepticism! In fact, I am reaching the point where I wonder if perhaps there is a special study course for those who write drug study results.
To quote Dr. Malcolm Kendrick (of Red Flags Weekly)
"As this study presently stands, because they used different drugs, anyone can make the case that the benefits seen in the patients on atorvastatin had nothing to do with greater LDL lowering; they were purely due to direct drug effects of atorvastatin. And it is impossible for the authors to argue that this is not the case.
In addition, there is some very powerful evidence out there that directly contradicts the hypothesis that the degree of LDL lowering, and the protection against death are connected. This evidence comes from across the ocean, and is provided by another study which – perhaps to no-one's great surprise, attracted very little attention at all. "
And here it is, followed by another commentary by Dr. Kendrick:
Large scale cohort study of the relationship between serum cholesterol concentration and coronary events with low-dose simvastatin therapy in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Matsuzaki M, Kita T, Mabuchi H, Matsuzawa Y, Nakaya N, Oikawa S, Saito Y, Sasaki J, Shimamoto K, Itakura H; J-LIT Study Group. Japan Lipid Intervention Trial.
Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan. masunori@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp
Hyperlipidemia is a well-established risk factor for primary coronary heart disease (CHD). Although simvastatin is known to lower serum lipid concentrations, the protective effect of such lipid-lowering therapy against primary CHD has not been established in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia. The Japan Lipid Intervention Trial was a 6-year, nationwide cohort study of 47,294 patients treated with open-labeled simvastatin (5-10 mg/day) and monitored by physicians under standard clinical conditions. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between the occurrence of CHD and the serum lipid concentrations during low-dose simvastatin treatment. Simvastatin reduced serum concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein- cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG), by 18.4%, 26.8% and 16.1% on average, respectively, during the treatment period. The risk of coronary events was higher when the average TC concentration was or =240 mg/dl and the average LDL-C concentration was or =160 mg/dl. The incidence of coronary events increased in the patients with TG concentration or =300 mg/dl compared with patients with TG concentration <150 mg/dl. The high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) inversely correlated with the risk of coronary events. The J-curve association was observed between average TC or LDL-C concentrations and total mortality. Malignancy was the most prevalent cause of death. The health of patients should be monitored closely when there is a remarkable decrease in TC and LDL-C concentrations with low-dose statin. A reasonable strategy to prevent coronary events in Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients without prior CHD under low-dose statin treatment might be regulating the serum lipid concentrations to at least <240 mg/dl for TC, <160 mg/dl for LDL-C, <300 mg/dl for TG, and 40 mg/dl for HDL-C.
PMID: 12499611
"It showed that there is no correlation whatsoever between the amount of LDL lowering, and death rate. None. This, please remember, in a study that had ten times as many patients, lasted almost three times as long and – perhaps most importantly – used the same drug, at the same dose, in all patients. So it actually means something.
In contrast what did ....the other study ... really prove? It proved that atorvastatin protects against heart disease and death better than pravastatin. What it most certainly did not prove is that the more you lower the LDL level the greater the protection. " |
March 09, 2004

Too posh to push
by
vtmnldy
on Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:20 PM CST
| A French Doctor who originated the idea of "Pool" births has written a book suggesting that fooling around with natural child birth - except in cases of emergency (the "Too-posh-to-push" syndrome, they call it in Britain!) can have unexpected consequences for the children later in life.
Read the review of his book here. |
March 03, 2004

We are all Guilty of the Good we do not do
by
vtmnldy
on Wed 03 Mar 2004 12:21 PM CST
After mentioning my tapestries in the newsletter, I got a number of requests to show one of them - so here is a picture of the last one I finished. The script at the top reads "We are all guilty of the good we do not do" Enjoy! It measures about 4 by 5 feet.
Mar 9th Because this makes the page load so slowly, I have made it available on its own page: to see it click here. |
March 01, 2004

Carbohydrates and one's mood
by
vtmnldy
on Mon 01 Mar 2004 12:22 PM CST
| It's now official: an actual study proves what we pretty much knew already, that being deprived of carbs makes one grumpy. Read the report here.
Some interesting stuff towards the end , where they talk about serotonin and its effect on dieters.
I will be away from March 4th through March 10th, so any personal messages will be held until I can take care of them after my return. I am headed for the big Natural Foods Merchandiser convention in Anaheim California. |
|
|